Fry v. Hurst’s Empirical Analysis
1956
Citation profile
3 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently November 2015
3 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Echolustee Oil Co. v. Johnston · Rose v. Cook
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Where the evidence is conflicting as to the existence of facts ... the findings of the trial court thereon will not be disturbed where they are not against the clear weight of the evidence.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. McGINNITY v. KIRK
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.