Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 293 S.C. 176 - Garrett v. Snedigar

Garrett v. Snedigar’s Empirical Analysis

1987

Citation profile

24
cited by 24 later decisions
1
states following
May 2018
most recently cited

20 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 24 later decisions — most recently May 2018

20 state decisions

1001987199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 15 U.S.C. § 77B (§ 2 of the Securities Act of 1933)

Relies on Securities & Exchange Commission v. W. J. Howey Co. · Transamerica Mortgage Advisors, Inc. v. Lewis · United Housing Foundation, Inc. v. Forman · Tcherepnin v. Knight · Federal Election Commission v. Machinists Non-Partisan Political League

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “An interlocutory appeal of this issue ... is not normally allowed. See Davis-McGee Mule Co. v. Marett, 129 S.C. 36, 37 , 123 S.E. 323, 323 (1924) (“No appeal can be made except from a final judgment.”). An order denying summary judgment cannot be appealed, even after trial. Holloman v. McAllister, 289 S.C. 183 , 345 S.E.2d 728 (1986). However, these issues are properly before us because the issue of whether the Circuit Court erred in granting the motion of the plaintiffs for partial summary judgment is appeal-able. See Briggs v. Richardson, 273 S.C. 376, 379 , 256 S.E.2d 544, 546 (1979) (“While not normally appealable, this issue is before the Court due to the appealability of the fírsi issue.”).”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.