Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 293 S.C. 4 - Oyler v. . Oyler

Oyler v. . Oyler’s Empirical Analysis

1987

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
2
states following
October 1998
most recently cited

7 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Allen v. Allen · McNaughton v. McNaughton · Powers v. Powers · Calcutt v. Calcutt · Checker Yellow Cab Co. v. Checker Cab & Parcel Service, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Had the wife in this case been on notice that the husband would raise adultery as a bar to her alimony claim, she could have pled and sought to prove recrimination or condo-nation as dictated by Family Court Rule 11---- In our opinion it would be extremely unjust to allow the husband to raise the issue of adultery, a complete bar to alimony, by surprise at this stage of the case.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “[c]learly, ... adultery involves the introduction of new matter which constitutes an avoidance to a claim for alimony,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.