Oyler v. . Oyler’s Empirical Analysis
1987
Citation profile
7
cited by 7 later decisions
2
states following
October 1998
most recently cited
7 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Allen v. Allen · McNaughton v. McNaughton · Powers v. Powers · Calcutt v. Calcutt · Checker Yellow Cab Co. v. Checker Cab & Parcel Service, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Had the wife in this case been on notice that the husband would raise adultery as a bar to her alimony claim, she could have pled and sought to prove recrimination or condo-nation as dictated by Family Court Rule 11---- In our opinion it would be extremely unjust to allow the husband to raise the issue of adultery, a complete bar to alimony, by surprise at this stage of the case.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Doe v. Doe“[c]learly, ... adultery involves the introduction of new matter which constitutes an avoidance to a claim for alimony,”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Griffith v. Griffith
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.