Lebovitz v. Mudd’s Empirical Analysis
1987
Citation profile
11 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently August 2015
11 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on North Carolina National Bank v. Evans · Coleman v. Law · Whitehurst v. Abbott · Miller v. Hughes · Dillon Tire Service, Inc. v. Pope
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Every gift, grant, alienation, bargain, transfer, and conveyance of lands ... or other profit or charge 14 out of the same ... which may be had or made to or for any intent or purpose to delay, hinder, or defraud creditors and others of their just and lawful ... debts ... must be deemed and taken ... to be clearly and utterly void, frustrate and of no effect, any pretense, color, feigned consideration, expressing of use, or any other matter or thing to the contrary notwithstanding.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Oskin v. Johnson
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.