Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 293 So. 2d 425 - Brown v. State

293 So. 2d 425 - Brown v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1974

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
2
states following
February 2011
most recently cited

9 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently February 2011

9 state decisions

6019741980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · 278 So. 2d 384 - Glass v. State · Sauer v. State · 204 So. 2d 463 - McElroy v. State · Andrews v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Mrs. Gainey, you won't believe it, it was an accident.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “The trial court conducted a preliminary inquiry out of the presence of the jury and the proof established that the statements made by appellant to Mrs. Gainey were free and voluntary. It was also established that the conversation was not instigated by anyone connected with any law enforcement agency. Mrs. Gainey wanted to find out why appellant had killed her daughter. Although appellant was in jail at the time this confrontation occurred, it did not amount to custodial interrogation within the meaning of the rule announced in Miranda v. Arizona, supra . Glass v. State, 278 So.2d 384 (Miss. 1973); and McElroy v. State, 204 So.2d 463 (Miss. 1967). The trial court correctly held that this testimony was admissible. ( 293 So.2d at 428 )”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.