Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 293 SO2D 87 - Fried v. Easton

Fried v. Easton’s Empirical Analysis

1974

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
2
states following
July 2014
most recently cited

10 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently July 2014

10 state decisions

5019741980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 175 So. 2d 54 - Citizens National Bank of St. Petersburg v. Peters

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “* * * * * * "A stockholder may bring a suit in his own right to redress an injury sustained directly by him, and which is separate and distinct from that sustained by other stockholders; however, if injury is primarily against corporations, or stockholders generally, then the cause of action is in the corporation and the individual's right to bring it is derived from the corporation. Citizens National Bank of St. Petersburg v. Peters, Fla.App. 1965, 175 So.2d 54 ." * * * * * *”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.