Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 293 SW3D 1 - White v. White

White v. White’s Empirical Analysis

2009

Citation profile

33
cited by 33 later decisions
2
states following
July 2018
most recently cited

33 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Smith v. Organization of Foster Families for Equality & Reform · Nazeri v. Missouri Valley College · 193 Wis. 2d 649 - In Re Custody of HSHK · 189 Cal. App. 2d 658 - Clevenger v. Clevenger · Rubano v. DiCenzo

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 33 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[i]f he is a minor, he may be represented by a next friend appointed for him for any such action. The child's mother or father or the division of child support enforcement or any person having physical or legal custody of the child may represent him as his next friend. A[GAL] shall be appointed for the child only if child abuse or neglect is alleged, or if the child is named as a defendant, or if the court determines that the interests of the child and his next friend are in conflict.[ [2] ]”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[A]t least since 1973, Missouri courts have recognized that a third party’s foundational standing to litigate custody or visitation is dependent upon the third party being a named party in an action brought by someone else (parent, Juvenile Officer) or being permitted to intervene in a pending action (dissolution) or in cases where the third party already has something other than de facto custody (decretal custody).”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “Our review of a dismissal for failure to state a claim or for lack of standing is de novo.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.