Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 293 SW3D 39 - Croxton v. State

Croxton v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2009

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
August 2018
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Addington v. Texas · Letz v. Turbomeca Engine Corp. · In Re the Care & Treatment of Van Orden · Gallagher v. DaimlerChrysler Corp. · State v. Norton

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[t]he trial court is in a better position to determine the prejudicial effect, if any, of improper evidence....”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.