¶1 ORDER
¶2 Anthony Smith appeals the circuit court’s denial of his motion to reopen his Rule 29.15 post-conviction case. On appeal, Smith claims that he was entitled to have the Rule 29.15 proceedings reopened because he was abandoned by his post-conviction counsel. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum has been provided to the parties.
¶3 The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).