Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 293 U.S. 155 - Warner v. Goltra

Warner v. Goltra’s Empirical Analysis

293 U.S. 155 · 1934

Citation profile

506
cited by 506 later decisions
57
cited 57 times by the Supreme Court
15
states following
September 2021
most recently cited

206 federal appellate · 43 district · 57 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 506 later decisions (57 by the Supreme Court) — most recently September 2021 · most notably Helvering v. Hallock (1940), Mahnich v. Southern Steamship Co. (1944)

206 federal appellate · 43 district · 57 state decisions — followed in 15 states

10601934194019501960197019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 33 U.S.C. § 901

Relies on Panama Co v. Johnson · Cortes v. Baltimore Insular Line, Inc. · Chelentis v. Luckenbach Steamship Co. · International Stevedoring Co. v. Haverty · Jamison v. Encarnacion

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 506 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[T]he maritime law by inveterate tradition has made the ordinary seaman a member of a favored class.”
    8 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “must be read in the light of the mischief to be corrected and the end to be obtained.”
    7 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. ““In the construction of this chapter, every person having the command of any vessel belonging to any citizen of the United States shall be deemed to be the ‘master’ thereof; and every person (apprentices excepted) who shall be employed or engaged to serve in any capacity on board the same shall be deemed and taken to be a ‘seaman’; and the term ‘vessel’ shall be understood to comprehend every description of vessel navigating on any sea or channel, lake or river * *”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.