Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 293 U.S. 237 - Mitchell v. Maurer

Mitchell v. Maurer’s Empirical Analysis

293 U.S. 237 · 1934

Citation profile

1,378
cited by 1,378 later decisions
34
cited 34 times by the Supreme Court
4
states following
February 2026
most recently cited

772 federal appellate · 40 district · 10 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 1,378 later decisions (34 by the Supreme Court) — most recently February 2026 · most notably Seminole Tribe of Florida v. Florida (1996), Fw/pbs Inc II v. City of Dallas Mjr Inc (1990)

772 federal appellate · 40 district · 10 state decisions

29101934194019501960197019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Appellate journey

reviewedMitchell v. Maurer (from Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals)

Relationships

Relies on Mansfield Ry Co v. Swan · William Booth v. Ferdinand Clark · White v. Ewing · Hooe v. Jamieson

Cited together with Bender v. Williamsport Area School District · Mansfield Ry Co v. Swan · United States v. Corrick · Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better Environment · American Fire & Casualty Co. v. Finn

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1,378 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[E]very federal appellate court has a special obligation to 'satisfy itself not only of its own jurisdiction, but also that of the lower courts in a cause under review,' even though the parties are prepared to concede it.”
    55 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “cannot be waived or be overcome by an agreement of the parties.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “The order appointing ancillary receivers attacked in McCandless v. Furlaud ... on the ground that the court was without federal jurisdiction, had been entered, not in the suit there under review, but in a separate proceeding in the same court.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.