Tirrell v. Johnston

Supreme Court of the United States

Argued December 14, 1934.

Decided December 17, 1934.

Supreme Court of the United States · decided 1934-12-17

Cited by 2 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently December 1937

1 counsel of record

Relies on Willcuts v. Bunn · Fox Film Corporation v. Doyal · Alward v. Johnson

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1934-12-17

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Mr. Samuel A. Margolis for appellant. Mr. Francis W. Johnston, Attorney General of New Hampshire, and Mr. H. Thornton Lorimer, Assistant Attorney General, were on the brief for appellees.

¶2Per Curiam:

¶3Judgment affirmed. Alward v. Johnson, 282 U. S. 509, 514; Willcuts v. Bunn, 282 U. S. 216, 225-226; Fox Film Corp. v. Doyal, 286 U. S. 123, 128-129; Susquehanna Co. v. Tax Commission (No. 1), 283 U. S. 291, 294; Indian Territory Oil Co. v. Board, 288 U. S. 325, 327-328.

Download

Copy

Embed on your site

Hover to preview · click to copy the code

Search Wikipedia →

Court

Supreme Court of the United States

Bench at the time

Charles Evans Hughes
Chief Justice
Benjamin Nathan Cardozo
Associate Justice
George Sutherland
Associate Justice
Harlan Fiske Stone
Associate Justice
James Clark McReynolds
Associate Justice
Louis Dembitz Brandeis
Associate Justice
Owen Josephus Roberts
Associate Justice
Pierce Butler
Associate Justice
Willis Van Devanter
Associate Justice

Counsel

Mr. Samuel A. Margolis for appellant. Mr. Francis W. Johnston, Attorney General of New Hampshire, and Mr. H. Thornton Lorimer, Assistant Attorney General, were on the brief for appellees.

In the law dictionary

Defined terms used in this case