Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 293 U.S. 62 - Gillis v. State of California

Gillis v. State of California’s Empirical Analysis

293 U.S. 62 · 1934

Citation profile

120
cited by 120 later decisions
4
cited 4 times by the Supreme Court
2
states following
September 2012
most recently cited

32 federal appellate · 8 district · 6 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 120 later decisions (4 by the Supreme Court) — most recently September 2012 · most notably 1993-1 Hillis Motors Inc v. Hawaii Automobile Dealers' Association (1993), Palmer v. Webster & Atlas National Bank (1941)

32 federal appellate · 8 district · 6 state decisions

300193419401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Appellate journey

reviewedthe decision below (from Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals)

Relationships

Relies on Bessette v. W. B. Conkey Co. · Ex parte Robinson · Ex Parte Tyler · Michaelson v. United States ex rel. Chicago · Erb v. Morasch

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 120 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[A] trustee, receiver or manager appointed in any cause pending in any court of the United States, including a debtor in possession, shall manage and operate the property in his possession as such trustee, receiver or manager according to the requirements of the valid laws of the State in which such property is situated, in the same manner that the owner or possessor thereof would be bound to do if in possession thereof.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.