Bagguley v. Bush’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

3 federal appellate ·

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “rather than required, to do so. Scalise, 891 F.2d at 644. Moreover, as the Seventh Circuit also noted, a broad grant of discretionary authority is particularly appropriate to prison transfer decisions, depending as they do on a variety of considerations. Cf. Meachum v. Fano, 427 U.S. at 225, 96 S.Ct. at 2538 (1976) (”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
   e.g. Bagguley v. Bush

2. “Id. 2 As a result, Bagguley's claim that he has a protected liberty interest in transfer fails. See id. (because state's prison regulations place no substantive limits on official discretion, prison administrator's discretion concerning interstate transfer is”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
   e.g. Bagguley v. Bush

3. “), which provides for the transfer of foreign prisoners to their home countries. The Transfer of Offenders to and from Foreign Countries Act, 18 U.S.C. § 4100 et seq. (1988) (”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. Bagguley v. Bush