Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 293 Va. 304 - Kim v. Commonwealth

Kim v. Commonwealth’s Empirical Analysis

2017

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
February 2019
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Herring v. United States · Bolden v. Com. · Prillaman v. Commonwealth · Commonwealth v. Jenkins · Perry v. Com.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “To properly review the trial court's application of the law to the facts, '[w]e give deference to the trial court's factual findings and view the facts in the light most favorable to ... the prevailing part[y] below.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “required to apply the plain meaning of statutes,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.