Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 294 Ark. 563 - Gran v. Hale

Gran v. Hale’s Empirical Analysis

1988

Citation profile

36
cited by 36 later decisions
2
states following
October 2020
most recently cited

36 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 36 later decisions — most recently October 2020 · most notably Conner v. Simes (2003), State v. Dawson (2001)

36 state decisions

14019881990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State Ex Rel. Purcell v. Nelson · Bridges v. Arkansas Motor Coaches, Ltd., Inc. · Weston v. State · Burney v. Hargraves · North Little Rock Transportation Co. v. Sangster

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 36 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Certiorari lies to correct proceedings erroneous upon the face of the record when there is no other adequate remedy. It is available in the exercise of super intending control over a tribunal which is proceeding illegally where no other mode of review has been provided. Certiorari lies where there is a want of jurisdiction or an act in excess of jurisdiction which is apparent on the face of the record. It is not available to look beyond the face of the record to ascertain the actual merits of a controversy, to control discretion, to review a finding upon facts or review the exercise of a court's discretionary authority.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “Had he appealed the convictions, the complaints he now raises could have been reviewed. Neither mandamus, certiorari, nor prohibition may be used as a substitute for appeal.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.