Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 294 F.3d 492 - Montgomery v. Pinchak

Montgomery v. Pinchak’s Empirical Analysis

294 F.3d 492 · 2002

Citation profile

100
cited by 100 later decisions
1
states following
June 2019
most recently cited

12 federal appellate · 29 district · 1 state decisions

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 28 U.S.C. § 1915 · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Conley v. Gibson · Estelle v. Gamble · Wilson v. Seiter · General Motors Corporation Pick-Up Truck Fuel Tank Products Liability Litigation 94-1064 94-1194 94-1195 94-1198 94-1202 94-1203 94-1207 94-1208 94-1219 · Tabron v. Grace

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 100 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) the plaintiffs ability to present his or her own case; (2) the difficulty of the particular legal issues; (3) the degree to which factual investigation will be necessary and the ability of the plaintiff to pursue investigation; (4) the plaintiffs capacity to retain counsel on his own behalf; (5) the extent to which a case is likely to turn on credibility determinations; and (6) whether the case will require testimony from expert witnesses.”
    14 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “A medical malpractice case involves complex facts and medical records that even most lawyers struggle to comprehend. Hence, most of these cases require expert testimony.”); Pinchak, 294 F.3d at 504 (explaining that'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[i]ndigent civil litigants possess neither a constitutional nor a statutory right ■to appointed counsel,” Montgomery v. Pinchak, 294 F.3d 492, 498 (3d Cir.2002), district courts have the authority to”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.