Williams’s Empirical Analysis
Citation profile
1 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 21 later decisions — most recently July 2024
1 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Alyeska Pipeline Service Company v. Wilderness Society · Chambers v. Nasco, Inc. · State v. Simpson · United States v. ITT Continental Baking Co. · Muth v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“enjoin, suspend or restrain the operation of, or compliance with, any order affecting rates.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“did not resolve the rate interpretation dispute between the parties, rather it directed the parties to submit disputes about the interpretation of the tariff to the Public Service Commission.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Perry Williams“any rate disputes and new rates agreed upon by the parties must be submitted to the Public Service Commission.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Perry Williams
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.