Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

294 F. App'x 32

United States v. Oiler

U.S. Courts of Appeals

Decided September 23, 2008

This page is marked noindex.

U.S. Courts of Appeals · decided 2008-09-23

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3582

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion · Decided 2008-09-23

PER CURIAM:

¶1 Dorothy Ann Oiler appeals the district court’s order denying her request for re-sentencing, but granting her motion for reduction of sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Oiler, No. 5:06-cr-00098-2 (S.D.W.Va. May 7, 2008). We grant counsel’s motion to withdraw. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

¶2 AFFIRMED.

/294/fappx/32 · .json · Public domain