Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 294 FSUPP2D 784 - Layman v. Alexander

Layman v. Alexander’s Empirical Analysis

2003

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
June 2016
most recently cited

1 state decisions

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Conley v. Gibson · Harlow v. Fitzgerald · Farmer v. Brennan · Hishon v. King & Spalding · Neitzke v. Williams

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Deliberate indifference on the part of a supervisor may not be established ‘by pointing to a single incident or isolated incidents, ... for a supervisor cannot be expected to promulgate rules and procedures covering every conceivable occurrence within the area of his responsibilities.’ ” (quoting Slakan, 737 F.2d at 373 )); Russell v. Town of Chesapeake, 817 F.Supp. 38, 42 (S.D.W.Va.1993) (”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “[t]here are no allegations. . . from which the Court may reasonably infer that either [supervisory officials] had actual or constructive knowledge that their subordinates posed a pervasive and unreasonable risk of constitutional injury to citizens like [plaintiff]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.