Johnson v. Omondi’s Empirical Analysis
2013
Citation profile
32 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. · Mixon v. City of Warner Robins · Woodcraft ex rel. MacDonald, Inc. v. Georgia Casualty & Surety Co. · Ansley v. Raczka-Long · Gliemmo v. Cousineau
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 32 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[t]he party opposing summary judgment is not required to produce evidence demanding judgment for it, but is only required to present evidence that raises a genuine issue of material fact.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“In an action involving a health care liability claim arising out of the provision of emergency medical care in a hospital emergency department or obstetrical unit or in a surgical suite immediately following the evaluation or treatment of a patient in a hospital emergency department, no physician or health care provider shall be held liable unless it is proven by clear and convincing evidence that the physician or health care provider's actions showed gross negligence.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“gross negligence is the absence of even slight diligence, and slight diligence is defined in OCGA § 51-1-4 as that degree of care which every man of common sense, however inattentive he may be, exercises under the same or similar circumstances. In other words, gross negligence has been defined as equivalent to (the) failure to exercise even a slight degree of care, or lack of the diligence that even careless men are accustomed to exercise. 30”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.