Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 294 KAN 675 - State v. Mason

State v. Mason’s Empirical Analysis

2012

Citation profile

23
cited by 23 later decisions
1
states following
March 2025
most recently cited

23 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on State v. Ward · Lothian Cassidy, L.L.C. v. Lothian Oil Inc. · State v. Seward · State v. Cash · State v. Jolly

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “'A criminal sentence is effective upon pronouncement from the bench; it does not derive its effectiveness from the journal entry. A journal entry that imposes a sentence at variance with that pronounced from the bench is erroneous and must be corrected to reflect the actual sentence imposed.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “The journal entry of sentencing can be corrected by a nunc pro tunc order so that it reflects the actual sentence pronounced from the bench, which was a legal sentence.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “'no reasonable person would have taken the view adopted by the trial court.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.