Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 294 KAN 738 - State v. Frecks

State v. Frecks’s Empirical Analysis

2012

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
June 2015
most recently cited

6 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on State v. Ward · Lothian Cassidy, L.L.C. v. Lothian Oil Inc. · State v. Ortega-Cadelan · State v. Jamison · State v. Flores

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““(a) A departure sentence is subject to appeal by die defendant or the state. The appeal shall be to the appellate courts in accordance with rules adopted by the supreme court. [[Image here]] “(c) On appeal from a judgment or conviction entered for a felony committed on or after July 1, 1993, the appellate court shall not review: (1) Any sentence diat is witíiin the presumptive sentence for the crime.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.