Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 294 MASS 59 - Commonwealth v. Powers

Commonwealth v. Powers’s Empirical Analysis

1936

Citation profile

20
cited by 20 later decisions
1
states following
May 2019
most recently cited

2 district · 18 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently May 2019

2 district · 18 state decisions

60193619401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Commonwealth v. Madeiros · Commonwealth v. Merrick · Commonwealth v. Belenski · Commonwealth v. Festo · Commonwealth v. Anderson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““It is only when the Commonwealth begins to introduce its evidence that that presumption in [the defendant’s] favor begins to disappear; as the evidence against him goes in, then the presumption grows less and less strong; and if, at the conclusion of the case, the Commonwealth has convinced you beyond a reasonable doubt of his guilt, then the presumption has disappeared entirely . . . .””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.