Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

294 Minn. 556

202 N.W.2d 212

State v. Hardin

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided October 27, 1972

Supreme Court of Minnesota · decided 1972-10-27

Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently March 1986

5 state decisions

Relies on Village of Crosby v. Stemich

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1972-10-27

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Per Curiam.

¶1 This matter comes to us on appeal from an order of the Hennepin County Municipal Court. The defendant challenged the jurisdiction of *557 that* court and moved to dismiss the complaint against her which charged’ her with carrying a firearm in violation of a city ordinánce. The lower court denied the motion and we dismiss the appeal from that order. \

¶2 Under Minn. St. 632.01, an appeal in a criminal case may only be taken from a judgment or order denying a new trial. For purposes of appeal, ordinance violations are considered criminal proceedings. Village of Crosby v. Stemich, 160 Minn. 261, 199 N. W. 918 (1924). Thus, the appeal in this case is from a nonappealable order and we therefore dismiss the same.

¶3 Appeal ■ dismissed.

/294/minn/556 · .json · Public domain