Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 294 N.C. 220 - State v. Lester

State v. Lester’s Empirical Analysis

1978

Citation profile

76
cited by 76 later decisions
2
states following
July 2009
most recently cited

76 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 76 later decisions — most recently July 2009 · most notably State v. Hennis (1988), State v. Oliver (1981)

76 state decisions

4601978198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Gerstein v. Pugh · Johnson v. Louisiana · Keeble v. United States · Cappaert v. United States · State v. Foust

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 76 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The dying declarations of a deceased person regarding the cause or circumstances of his’death shall be admissible in evidence in all civil and criminal trials and other proceedings before courts, administrative agencies and other tribunals to the same extent and for the same purposes that they might have been admissible had the deceased survived and been sworn as a witness in the proceedings, subject to proof that: (1) At the time of the making of such declaration the deceased was conscious of approaching death and believed there was no hope of recovery; (2) Such declaration was voluntarily made.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. ““Demand or waiver of probable-cause hearing. — (a) The judge must schedule a probable-cause hearing unless the defendant waives in writing his right to such hearing. A defendant represented by counsel, or who desires to be represented by counsel, may not before the date of the scheduled hearing waive his right to a probable-cause hearing without the written consent of the defendant and his counsel.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. ““In view of the preexisting jurisdictional law and the fairly clear legislative intent ... it seems certain that no probable-cause hearing may be held in district court once the superior court has gained jurisdiction through the return of a true bill of indictment.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.