Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 294 N.W.2d 555 - Watson v. State

Watson v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1980

Citation profile

11
cited by 11 later decisions
1
states following
June 2018
most recently cited

11 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently June 2018

11 state decisions

801980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Hinkle v. State · State v. Williams · State v. O'CONNELL · State v. Coil · State v. Smith

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Summary disposition by the first statutory method is not proper if a material issue of fact exists. § 663A.6 (second paragraph, final sentence). [“Disposition on the pleadings and record is not proper if a material issue of fact exists.”] Thus we must determine by examining the pleadings and record before us whether any material issue of fact exists that militated the reception of evidence by trial court, as provided in section 663A.7.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “When counsel’s performance is put in issue, as it is here, an evidentiary hearing on the merits of the complaint will ordinarily be required. Such a hearing affords the parties an opportunity to adver-sarily develop all of the relevant circumstances attending counsel’s performance, including those circumstances and considerations which may be pertinent but are not a part of the criminal trial record,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.