¶1 Judgment affirmed, with costs on the ground that the action was not commenced within the time limited (see Kalmanash v. Smith, 291 N. Y. 142). No opinion.
¶2 Concur: Lehman, Ch. J., Loughban, Lewis, Conway, Desmond, Thacher and Dye, JJ.
294 N.Y. 896
63 N.E.2d 27
Decided July 19, 1945
New York Court of Appeals · decided 1945-07-19
Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently December 2003
Relies on Kalmanash v. Smith
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1945-07-19
View the full empirical analysis of this case →
¶1 Judgment affirmed, with costs on the ground that the action was not commenced within the time limited (see Kalmanash v. Smith, 291 N. Y. 142). No opinion.
¶2 Concur: Lehman, Ch. J., Loughban, Lewis, Conway, Desmond, Thacher and Dye, JJ.