State v. Mai’s Empirical Analysis
1982
Citation profile
3 federal appellate · 9 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently March 2019
3 federal appellate · 9 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 41 Wis. 2d 129 - State Ex Rel. Simos v. Burke · State v. Dodd · 208 Pa. Super. 483 - Commonwealth v. Vecchiolli · Rider v. Crouse
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[i]n all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall have the right to * * * have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“protects both the [defendant's] right to the attendance of the witness and the testimony of the witness”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“ORS 475.235(3). We turn to the question whether admitting the report under ORS 475.235 violated defendant's state or federal constitutional right to confront the witnesses against her. We first consider the matter under Article I, section 11, of the Oregon Constitution. The specific constitutional question presented is whether the statute diminishes the right to confront the witness and, more specifically, the two rights protected by the constitutional guarantee: the right to cross-examine and the right to demonstrate the witness' demeanor”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Hancock
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.