Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 294 Or. 650 - Waybrant v. Bernstein

Waybrant v. Bernstein’s Empirical Analysis

1983

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
2
states following
July 2009
most recently cited

8 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Analysis of appealability begins with the recognition of some basic precepts. A party does not have an inherent right to appellate court review; the right to appeal is wholly statutory and an appellant must establish that the decision from which the appeal is taken is appealable under some statutory provision.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “determine whether the plaintiff ha[d] established a colorable claim”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.