294 Pa. Super. 249 - Commonwealth v. Dozier’s Empirical Analysis
1982
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 28 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 30 later decisions — most recently October 2018 · most notably 363 Pa. Super. 328 - Commonwealth v. Grove (1987), 372 Pa. Super. 349 - Commonwealth v. Thomas (1988)
2 federal appellate · 28 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on California v. Arizona · Commonwealth v. Stoltzfus · Commonwealth v. Farquharson · Commonwealth v. Perkins · Commonwealth v. Smith
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 30 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““(a) Except as provided in sections 3121 (relating to rape), 3122.1 (relating to statutory sexual assault), 3123 (relating to involuntary deviate sexual intercourse) and 3124.1 (relating to sexual assault), a person who engages in the penetration, however slight of the genitals or anus of a complainant with apart of the person’s body for any purpose other than good faith medical, hygienic or law enforcement procedures commits aggravated indecent assault if: “(1) the person does so without the complainant’s consent; “(2) the person does so by forcible compulsion; “(3) the person does so by threat of forcible compulsion that would prevent resistance by a person of reasonable resolution; “(4) the complainant is unconscious or the person knows that the complainant is unaware that the penetration is occurring; “(5) the person has substantially impaired the complainant’s power to appraise or control his or her conduct by administering or employing without the knowledge of the complainant drugs, intoxicants or other means for the purpose of preventing resistance; “(6) the complainant suffers from a mental disability which renders him or her incapable of consent; “(7) the complainant is less than 13 years of age; or the complainant is less than 16 years of age and the person is four or more years older than the complainant and the complainant and the person are not married to each other.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.