Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 294 SW 641 - Stone v. Morrison Powers

Stone v. Morrison Powers’s Empirical Analysis

1927

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
June 1943
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““We think both the pleading and evidence were sufficient to sustain the. conclusion evidently reached by the jury and the trial court that, at the time the contract was signed, or shortly thereafter defendants told plaintiff that they did not know whether they had sufficient equipment and especially a hammer of sufficient ■size to do the work contracted to be performed, and that plaintiff told them that he would buy or rent them a hammer sufficient, if necessary. 'Therefore the assignment is overruled.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. ““Evidently the trial court concluded that the plaintiff below had abandoned Ms claim for damages. In so far as Ms prayer for injunction was concerned, such matter had already been settled and the injunction granted. The trial court evidently understood that the plaintiff was not attempting to recover against defendants any money judgment, but that the defendants were attempting to recover against the plaintiff a money judgment for damages.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “word `material' means the `substance of which anything is made.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.