Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

294 S.W.3d 137

State v. Hendrickson

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided October 13, 2009

Missouri Court of Appeals · decided 2009-10-13

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently July 2013

1 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2009-10-13

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1*138 ORDER

PER CURIAM.

¶2 The defendant, Jason Hendrickson, appeals the judgment entered by the Circuit Court of St. Louis County following his conviction by a jury of four counts of first-degree statutory sodomy, in violation of section 566.062 RSMo. (Supp.2008). Finding no error, we affirm.

¶3 We have reviewed the parties’ briefs and the record on appeal. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been provided with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order.

¶4 We affirm the trial court’s judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

/294/sw3d/137 · .json · Public domain