Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 294 U.S. 23 - McCrea v. United States

McCrea v. United States’s Empirical Analysis

294 U.S. 23 · 1935

Citation profile

178
cited by 178 later decisions
8
cited 8 times by the Supreme Court
1
states following
October 2013
most recently cited

68 federal appellate · 12 district · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 178 later decisions (8 by the Supreme Court) — most recently October 2013 · most notably Griffin v. Oceanic Contractors, Inc. (1982), Royal Indemnity Co. v. United States (1941)

68 federal appellate · 12 district · 2 state decisions

400193519401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Appellate journey

reviewedMcCrea v. United States (from Second Circuit Court of Appeals)

Relationships

Relies on Hovey v. McDonald · Collie v. Fergusson · O'Hara v. Luckenbach Steamship Co. · Chas. Wolff Packing Co. v. Court of Industrial Relations of Kansas

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 178 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “confers no right to recover double wages where the delay in payment of wages due was not in some sense arbitrary, willful, or unreasonable.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “affords a definite and reasonable procedure by which the seaman may establish his right to recover double pay where his wages are unreasonably withheld.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “for each and every day during which payment is delayed.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.