Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 294 U.S. 499 - United States v. Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific R.

United States v. Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific R.’s Empirical Analysis

294 U.S. 499 · 1935

Citation profile

836
cited by 836 later decisions
93
cited 93 times by the Supreme Court
26
states following
January 2021
most recently cited

191 federal appellate · 83 district · 167 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 836 later decisions (93 by the Supreme Court) — most recently January 2021 · most notably Securities and Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corporation Same (1947), Securities and Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corporation (1943)

191 federal appellate · 83 district · 167 state decisions — followed in 26 states

15301935194019501960197019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Florida v. United States · United States v. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad · Beaumont Ry Co v. United States · United States v. Illinois Cent R Co Wyoming Ry Co

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 836 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “We must know what a decision means before the duty becomes ours to say whether it is right or wrong.”
    38 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[a] zone of reasonableness exists between maxima and minima within which a carrier is ordinarily free to adjust its charges for itself.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. ““This court has held that an order of the Interstate Commerce Commission is void unless supported by findings of the basic or quasi-jurisdictional facts conditioning its power. Florida v. United States, 282 U.S. 194, 215 , 51 S.Ct. 119 , 75 L.Ed. 291 ; United States v. Baltimore & Ohio R. Co. (January 7, 1935), 293 U.S. 454 , 55 S.Ct. 268 , 79 L.Ed. 587 .” 294 U.S. 499, 504 , 55 S.Ct. 462, 465 , 79 L.Ed. 1023 . “The statement in the second of these paragraphs that the proposed rates would • be ‘unreasonable’ must be read in the light of the report as a whole, and then appears as a conclusion insufficient as a finding unless supported by facts more particularly stated.” 294 U.S. 499, 506 , 55 S.Ct. 462, 465 , 79 L.Ed. 1023 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.