Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 294 U.S. 648 - Continental Illinois Nat Bank Trust Co of Chicago v. Chicago R I & P Ry Co

Continental Illinois Nat Bank Trust Co of Chicago v. Chicago R I & P Ry Co’s Empirical Analysis

294 U.S. 648 · 1935

Citation profile

1,519
cited by 1,519 later decisions
114
cited 114 times by the Supreme Court
10
states following
January 2022
most recently cited

561 federal appellate · 108 district · 24 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 1,519 later decisions (114 by the Supreme Court) — most recently January 2022 · most notably Blanchette v. Connecticut General Insurance Corporations (1974), Granfinanciera, S.A. v. Nordberg (1989)

561 federal appellate · 108 district · 24 state decisions — followed in 10 states

38301935194019501960197019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Appellate journey

reviewedContinental Illinois Nat. Bank & Trust Co. v. Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. (from Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals)

Relationships

Relies on Local Loan Co. v. Hunt · Kline v. Burke Construction Co. · Patton v. United States · Calder et Wife, v. Bull et Wife. · Dimick v. Schiedt

Cited together with Louisville Joint Stock Land Bank v. Radford · Local Loan Co. v. Hunt · Hanover National Bank v. Moyses · Wright v. Vinton Branch of Mountain Trust Bank · Isaacs v. Hobbs Tie & Timber Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1,519 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “From the beginning, the tendency of legislation and of judicial interpretation has been uniformly in the direction of progressive liberalization in respect of the operation of the bankruptcy power.”
    19 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[T]o prevent the attainment of that object is to defeat the very end the accomplishment of which was the sole aim of the section, and thereby to render its provisions futile.”
    17 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “exclusive jurisdiction of the debtor and its property, wherever located.”
    7 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.