Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

294 U.S. App. D.C. 231

Ayuda, Inc. v. Thornburgh

U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided March 3, 1992

U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · decided 1992-03-03

Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently March 1992

13 federal appellate ·

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1992-03-03

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1*232ORDER

PER CURIAM.

¶2Appellees’ Suggestion for Rehearing En Banc and the response thereto have been circulated to the full Court. The taking of a vote was requested. Thereafter, a majority of the judges of the Court in regular active service did not vote in favor of the suggestion. Upon consideration of the foregoing it is

¶3ORDERED, by the Court en banc, that the suggestion is denied.

Chief Judge MIKVA and Circuit Judges WALD, HARRY T. EDWARDS, RUTH BADER GINSBURG and BUCKLEY would grant the suggestion for rehearing en banc.Separate statement filed by Circuit Judge WALD, dissenting from the denial of rehearing en banc.Separate statement filed by Circuit Judge SILBERMAN, concurring in the denial of rehearing en banc.Separate statement filed by Circuit Judge STEPHEN F. WILLIAMS, concurring in the denial of rehearing en banc.
/294/usappdc/231 · .json · Public domain