David v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1988
Citation profile
90 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 90 later decisions — most recently May 2018 · most notably Gillie v. State (1991), Scroggins v. State (1993)
90 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Wicks v. State · Gardner v. State · Parker v. State · Williams v. State · Orsini v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 90 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The burden is on the movant to show good cause for a continuance. A.R.Cr.P. Rule 27.3. A motion for continuance is addressed to the sound discretion of the trial court and the court’s decision will not be reversed absent a clear abuse of that discretion amounting to a denial of justice. Orsini v. State, 281 Ark. 348 , 665 S.W.2d 245 (1984). The burden of proving prejudice and an abuse of discretion rests on the appellant. Kelly v. State, 261 Ark. 31 , 545 S.W.2d 919 (1977) ....”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Touvell v. State“facts the affiant believes the witness will prove and not merely . . . the effect of the facts in evidence, that the affiant himself believes them to be true and that the witness is not absent by the consent, connivance, or procurement of the party asking the postponement.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Johnson v. State“corroboration must be sufficient standing alone to establish the commission of the offense and to connect the defendant with it.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Andrews v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.