Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 295 Ark. 154 - Ingram v. Pirelli Cable Corp.

Ingram v. Pirelli Cable Corp.’s Empirical Analysis

1988

Citation profile

28
cited by 28 later decisions
2
states following
January 2007
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 16 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 28 later decisions — most recently January 2007 · most notably Manning v. Metropolitan Life Insurance (1997), Kentucky Fried Chicken National Management Co. v. Weathersby (1992)

2 federal appellate · 16 state decisions

200198819902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on MBM Co., Inc. v. Counce · Sterling Drug, Inc. v. Oxford · Tandy Corp. v. Bone · Givens v. Hixson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 28 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The foregoing evidence reflects a serious conflict or dispute between [Ingram] and his supervisors, and while we believe the supervisors’ conduct was petty, insulting and less than one might expect from manager level executives of a reputable firm, we cannot agree such conduct was outrageous.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. ““Although [Ingram] and his wife related that he had experienced stress, chest pains and sleepless nights when dealing with the pressures foisted upon him by his supervisors, there is nothing in the record that shows he informed [the company] of these stress-related problems.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.