Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 295 Ark. 312 - Ellison v. Tubb

Ellison v. Tubb’s Empirical Analysis

1988

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
2
states following
May 2022
most recently cited

4 federal appellate · 6 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently May 2022

4 federal appellate · 6 state decisions

6019881990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Padgett v. Haston · Jones v. Gregg · Robards v. Brown

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “As a general rule it may be said that a contract is entire when, by its terms, nature, and purpose, it contemplates that each and all of its parts are interdependent and common to one another and to the consideration, and that it is sever-able when, in its nature and purpose, it is susceptible of division and apportionment. Acts of the parties in treating the contract as entire or severable have an important bearing on its construction.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.