Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

295 F. 1017

Docket No. 226.

In re Hamburger

Second Circuit Court of Appeals

Decided January 25, 1924.)

Second Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1924-01-25

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by (per_curiam) · Decided 1924-01-25

How this case has been cited

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently June 1969

1 federal appellate · 2 district · 1 state decisions

2019241930194019501960decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Petition to Revise Order of the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York.

¶2Leo Oppenheimer, of New York City (Leo N. Hiblum, of New York City, of counsel), for petitioner. Tanzer & Lane, of New York City (Charles J. Lane, of New York City, of counsel), for respondent.

¶3Before HOUGH, MANTON, and MAYER, Circuit Judges.

¶4PER CURIAM.

¶5Petition dismissed, without prejudice, in open court.

/295/f1d/1017 · .json · Public domain