Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

295 F. 123

Docket Nos. 4204, 4205.

Walker v. Wilkinson

Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals

Decided December 4, 1923.

Rehearing Denied January 15, 1924.)

Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1923-12-04

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently August 1932

6 federal appellate ·

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by Richard Wilde Walker · Decided 1923-12-04

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Petitions to Superintend and Revise, and Appeals from, the District Court of the United States for the Northern District of Texas; James C. Wilson, Judge.

¶2See. also, 294 Fed. 939. 951.

¶3J. A; Templeton and Clay Cooke, both’ of Fort Worth, Tex., for petitioners and appellants.

¶4Stanley Boykin, H. C. Ray, and Geo. M. Conner, all of Forth Worth, Tex. (Geo, M. Conner, Capps, Cant.ey, Hanger & Short, and Boykin & Ray, all of Fort Worth, Tex., on the brief), for respondents and appellees.

¶5Before WALKER and BRXAN, Circuit Judges, and GRUBB, District Judge.

¶6WALKER, Circuit Judge.

¶7Following the ruling made in the ease of

¶8Farmers’ & Mechanics’ National Bank v. W. W. Wilkinson, Trustee, 295 Fed. 120, Circuit Court of Appeals,'Fifth Circuit, present term, the appeal in each of the above numbered and entitled cases is dismissed, at the cost of the appellant, and the petition to revise in each of those eases is denied.

/295/f1d/123 · .json · Public domain