In re Krull’s Empirical Analysis
295 F. 520 · 1923
Citation profile
1 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently September 1983
1 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“if title of the [purchasers] is attacked in another tribunal, [the] court has no jurisdiction to prevent that tribunal from proceeding to an orderly determination of the rights of the parties”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.