Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 295 F.2d 209 - International Ass'n of Machinists, AFL-CIO v. Central Airlines, Inc.

International Ass'n of Machinists, AFL-CIO v. Central Airlines, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis

295 F.2d 209 · 1961

Citation profile

22
cited by 22 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
January 1982
most recently cited

17 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 22 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently January 1982

17 federal appellate ·

120196119701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Appellate journey

Relationships

Relies on Textile Workers v. Lincoln Mills of Ala. · Gully v. First Nat. Bank in Meridian · Skelly Oil Co. v. Phillips Petroleum Co. · Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Mottley · Steele v. Louisville & Nashville Railroad

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the prompt and orderly settlement of all disputes growing out of grievances or out of the interpretation or application of agreements covering rates of pay, rules, or Working conditions.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  2. ““This Court squarely held that in non-diversity cases an airline system board award is not enforceable in the federal courts under Section 184.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “to avoid any interruption to commerce or to the operation of any carrier engaged therein”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.