Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 295 F.2d 495 - Lewis Hughes v. Chester C. Noble

Lewis Hughes v. Chester C. Noble’s Empirical Analysis

295 F.2d 495 · 1961

Citation profile

61
cited by 61 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
May 2024
most recently cited

42 federal appellate · 1 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 61 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently May 2024 · most notably Estelle v. Gamble (1976), Basista v. Weir (1965)

42 federal appellate · 1 district ·

2401961197019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Conley v. Gibson · Monroe v. Pape · Lewis v. Brautigam · Coleman v. Johnston

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 61 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““In appraising the sufficiency of a complaint we follow, of course, the accepted rule that a complaint should not be dismissed for failure to state a claim unless it appears beyond doubt that the plaintiff can prove no set of facts in support of his claim which would entitle him to relief.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““[It must] appear beyond doubt that the plaintiff can prove no set of facts in support of his claim which would entitle them to relief. See Monroe v. Pape, 1961, 365 U.S. 167 , 81 S.Ct. 473 , 5 L.Ed.2d 492 ; Coleman v. Johnston, 7 Cir., 1957, 247 F.2d 273 ; Hardwick v. Hurley, 7 Cir., 1961, 289 F.2d 529 .” Hughes v. Noble, 295 F.2d 495 (5th Cir. 1961).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.