Langhammer v. Hamilton’s Empirical Analysis
295 F.2d 642 · 1961
Citation profile
19 federal appellate · 1 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 26 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently July 1990 · most notably Kungys v. United States (1988), Fedorenko v. United States (1981)
19 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Galvan v. Press · Ng Fung Ho v. White · Chaunt v. United States · Rowoldt v. Perfetto
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“shall not apply to an alien otherwise admissible at the time of entry”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. SLADE“fraud and wilful misrepresentation of a material fact.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.