Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

295 F.2d 691

Docket No. 19075.

Marek v. Ribicoff

Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1961-10-06

Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently April 1989

3 federal appellate ·

2 counsel of record

Relies on Marek v. Flemming

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1961-10-06

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas; Joe M. Ingraham, J.

Ben H. Schleider, Jr., Houston, Tex., for appellant.

Robert C. Maley, Jr., Asst. U.S. Atty., Houston, Tax., Alan S. Rosenthal and W. Harold Bigham, Attys., Civil Division, Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., for appellee.

Before TUTTLE, Chief Judge, and JONES and WISDOM, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

¶1

On consideration of the motion of appellee to remand to above entitled and numbered cause to the District Court with instructions that the action be further remanded to the Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare for a determination of the amount of the survivor's benefits to which appellant and her children, Gale E. Swefford and Marla J. Swefford, are entitled under the Act, and of the reply of appellant consenting to said motion,

¶2

It is ordered that the judgment of the District Court, 192 F.Supp. 528, is hereby vacated and the cause is remanded for that purpose pursuant to said motion.

/295/f2d/691 · .json · Public domain