Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 295 F.2d 83 - United States Ex Rel. Benjamin Reid v. Mark S. Richmond, Warden of Connecticut State Prison

United States Ex Rel. Benjamin Reid v. Mark S. Richmond, Warden of Connecticut State Prison’s Empirical Analysis

295 F.2d 83 · 1961

Citation profile

48
cited by 48 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
2
states following
March 1988
most recently cited

22 federal appellate · 4 district · 6 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 48 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently March 1988 · most notably Link v. Wabash Railroad (1962), Brubaker v. Dickson (1962)

22 federal appellate · 4 district · 6 state decisions

420196119701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Powell v. State of Alabama Patterson · Yakus v. United States · Culombe v. Connecticut · Lisenba v. People of State of California · Rogers v. Richmond

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 48 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““ * * * Having made no objection, Reid should not now be heard to raise constitutional objections which he did not see fit to urge at the earlier stage. * * * “Every defendant must, of course, be accorded a fair trial. But the state is also entitled to a fair trial. When, after an extended hearing, informed and experienced defense counsel has taken a position, and the state, in reliance on it, has tried its case accordingly, it would be unduly tipping the scales of justice against the state to permit a defendant to argue that his conviction must be vacated because his counsel should not have taken the position he did and should not have made the concessions on which the state acted. * * * f>”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “It was the strategy of the defense to admit all that had happened, including the confessions, and to attempt thereby to derive whatever benefit there might be from an open and consistent course of not attempting to deny or conceal anything from the jury. 295 F.2d at 87 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “to rely on the decisions made by counsel and the defendant himself.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.