Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 295 F.3d 1024 - Saffold v. Carey

Saffold v. Carey’s Empirical Analysis

295 F.3d 1024 · 2002

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
January 2011
most recently cited

3 federal appellate ·

Relationships

Relies on Carey Warden v. Saffold · 5 Cal. 4th 813 - In Re Harris · Saffold v. Newland

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “within a reasonable time after [he] knew, or with due diligence should have known, the facts underlying the claim as well as the legal basis for the claim.” In re Hams, 5 Cal.4th 813 , 21 Cal.Rptr.2d 373 , 855 P.2d 391 , 398 n. 7 (Cal.1993). As the Supreme Court observed in Saffoldf],”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.