In Re Application of Asher B. Edelman’s Empirical Analysis
2002
Citation profile
2 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 30 later decisions — most recently September 2020 · most notably 428 F. Supp. 2d 188 - In Re Microsoft Corp. (2006), 400 F. Supp. 2d 500 - Zaranska v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY (2005)
2 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Consumer Product Safety Commission v. GTE Sylvania, Inc. · Perrin v. United States · Rubin v. United States · Crandon v. United States · Burnham v. Superior Court of Cal., County of Marin
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 30 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““(1) that the person from whom discovery is sought reside (or be found) in the district of the district court to which the application is made, (2) that the discovery be for use in a proceeding before a foreign tribunal, and (3) that the application be made by a foreign or international tribunal or ‘any interested person.’ ””
5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority““[t]he district court of the district in which a person resides or is found may order him to ... produce a document ... for use in a proceeding in a foreign or international tribunal ... The order may be made pursuant to a ... request made, by a foreign or international tribunal or upon the application of any interested person ... To the extent that the order does not prescribe otherwise, ... the document ... [shall be] produced, in accordance with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.””
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“When interpreting the meaning of a statute-the task we have before us-the starting point of inquiry is of course the language of the statute itself.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.